It means that the European Court has not violated the principle of subsidiarity. In case of Rustavi 2 TV, the television appealed to all national instances before making an application to the ECHR. According to the same principle, ECHR is authorized to consider violations of particular rights by the states rather than to act as a court of last resort. If they have not provided redress, an application may be made to the European Court. The principle of subsidiarity requires that national courts must have the opportunity to consider and redress the alleged violations. Thus, the European Court has not violated the principle of subsidiarity. This statement by Eva Gotsiridze is false as Rustavi 2 TV applied to ECHR only after all available domestic appeal procedures had been exhausted. Such interference by the ECHR was on the verge of infringing national sovereignty.” It was a violation of the principle of subsidiarity, because, first and foremost, it is up to the national court to settle a certain dispute, and the Strasbourg court has to render additional assistance. On April 24, 2017, primetime.ge released an interview with Eva Gotsiridze, member of the High Council of Justice, in which she slams the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) for its decision to temporarily suspend the enforcement of the Georgian Supreme Court’s ruling over the Rustavi 2 TV case.Įva Gotsiridze, member of the High Council of Justice: “For me, as a lawyer, some questions have arisen to the Strasbourg court.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |